- Home
- Architecture & Hardening
- Application security
Ship software that holds up,
without slowing the people who build it.
Secure code review, software composition and dependency analysis, application and API testing, and secure-by-design review, with findings delivered into the tools your developers already use.
A second pair of eyes on the code you ship.
If you build your own software, your applications are part of your attack surface, and often the part tested least. Automated scanners find the easy bugs. The flaws that matter most, broken authorization, business-logic abuse, weak trust boundaries, are found by people reading the code and thinking like an attacker.
We do both. We review code and architecture by hand, run static, dynamic and composition analysis, test the running application and its APIs, and then put the findings into the pull request, the ticket queue or the pipeline, not a long report nobody reads. The aim is a programme your developers adopt because it helps them, not one they route around.
- Manual secure code review of high-risk components and critical business logic
- Software composition analysis: vulnerable dependencies and licence risk
- Authenticated application and API testing against the OWASP Top 10
- A threat model and architecture review of authentication, authorization and trust boundaries
- Findings filed into your developer tooling, with fix guidance and a re-test
- An application security programme assessment against OWASP SAMM, if you want one
From design to deploy.
Understand the application
We walk through architecture, data flows and trust boundaries with your developers and build a threat model before we test.
Review and test
Manual code review on the riskiest paths, automated static and composition analysis across the codebase, and hands-on testing of the running application and APIs.
Deliver where developers work
Findings land in your tracker or pull requests with proof, impact and a concrete fix, not only in a PDF.
Build it into the pipeline
We tune scanning in CI so it fails fast on real issues and stays quiet on noise, and help set up a security champion model.
Re-test
Once fixes are in, we verify them and close the findings.
Three ways to find the flaws.
Static, dynamic and composition
SAST tuned to cut false positives, DAST on authenticated workflows, dependency and container image analysis, secrets detection.
Manual review and threat modelling
Hand review of critical logic, STRIDE-style threat modelling, cryptography and key handling review.
Programme and enablement
SAMM maturity assessment, secure coding guidance for your stack, security champions and remediation workflow.
Who it is for
Organizations that build their own software: customer-facing platforms, internal applications, SaaS products and mobile apps. Especially teams shipping often, where security review has to keep up with release pace.
- Penetration testing, attack the running application from outside
- API security, deep testing of the interfaces behind your apps
- DevSecOps, secure the pipeline that ships the code
- Cloud security, the platform your application runs on
What buyers ask.
Our developers are good.
They are, and they are measured on shipping. This is a second pair of eyes focused on how the code could be abused, not a judgement on the people who wrote it.
We already run a scanner in CI.
Scanners find known patterns. Broken authorization and business-logic flaws do not look like a pattern; finding them takes a person reading the code with the business in mind.
Will this slow our releases?
It should not. We tune pipeline checks to fail only on real issues, deliver findings in the tools your developers already use, and schedule deeper review around your release cycle.
Is this the same as a penetration test?
Overlapping, not the same. A penetration test attacks the running application from outside. Application security also looks at the code, the design and the pipeline, which finds issues a black-box test cannot.
Find the flaws before your users do.
Put an engineer on a call to scope an application security review. No charge, no commitment.